IQ Score Chart: Percentiles, Ranges and What Your Score Means
What does an IQ score of 100, 115 or 130 mean? Start with the bell curve and percentile table below, then learn how to read the scale without confusing a score with a percentage.
Updated
A visual reference, not a test result
Where does a score sit on the curve?
Explore a normal distribution with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. The shaded range, 85–115, contains about 68.3% of this model.
Use a whole number from 40 to 160. This is not a place to enter your Ikigain percentage score.
Approximate model percentile
50
About 50% of this model lies at or below 100. At the mean.
| Score | Percentile | Position on this scale |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | 2.275 | 2 SD below the mean |
| 85 | 15.866 | 1 SD below the mean |
| 90 | 25.249 | 0.67 SD below the mean |
| 100 | 50 | At the mean |
| 110 | 74.751 | 0.67 SD above the mean |
| 115 | 84.134 | 1 SD above the mean |
| 120 | 90.879 | 1.33 SD above the mean |
| 130 | 97.725 | 2 SD above the mean |
| 145 | 99.865 | 3 SD above the mean |
Calculated from the normal cumulative distribution, using z = (score − 100) ÷ 15. Values are rounded, not exact ranks from a test's norm sample. If your report uses a different scale or gives its own percentile, use that test's documentation.
01
The familiar 100 and 15 convention
Many, but not all, IQ scales are reported with mean 100 and standard deviation 15. Roughly speaking, 85 and 115 are one standard deviation below and above the mean on such a scale.
This convention describes transformed norm scores. It is not a universal raw-score ruler and does not authorize conversion from an unrelated test.
02
Percentiles and standard scores answer different questions
A standard score describes distance from the norm mean on the chosen scale. A percentile rank describes the proportion of the norm distribution at or below a score under that test's rules.
Percentile intervals are uneven: equal standard-score differences do not produce equal percentile-point differences near the center and tails.
03
Why range labels vary
Labels such as average, high average or superior are publisher-specific interpretive conventions. Cut points and wording differ, and some terms carry historical baggage.
Use the manual for the administered test. A generic web chart can illustrate a distribution, but it should not overwrite the test's official score definitions.
04
Confidence intervals belong beside the score
No observed score is perfectly precise. A confidence interval communicates a plausible range for the underlying score under a stated model and confidence level.
Small differences between two numbers may not support a meaningful rank order, especially across different domains or instruments.
05
A worked reading example
Suppose a manual reports a standard score of 112 on a scale with mean 100 and standard deviation 15, together with a confidence interval of 106–118. The observed value is 12 scale points above the norm mean, but the interval shows that plausible values cover a wider band. The correct interpretation comes from that manual's norms and precision study—not from treating 112 as 112 questions, 112 percent or a universal ranking.
If another website reports 16 of 20 correct, that result is 80 percent correct on its form. It does not become IQ 112 by matching the numbers to a generic chart. A norm conversion must be estimated for that exact form and eligible population, and it should carry its own uncertainty.
06
Why the tails require extra caution
Very high and very low scores are supported by fewer observations in most norm samples. Short forms may also have too few appropriately targeted items to distinguish people near the ends of a distribution. Ceiling and floor effects can compress different performances into the same reported result.
A smooth mathematical curve can produce precise-looking tail percentiles even where a real test has limited evidence. Those calculated decimals are not extra measurement precision. Use the required approved instrument and administration for consequential decisions, not a rounded online chart.
07
A safe chart-reading checklist
Before interpreting a chart, identify the exact test, edition, age or comparison group, standard deviation, norm date, confidence level and intended use.
- Never convert a raw total with an unrelated chart
- Do not compare scores from different scales without documentation
- Treat labels as summaries, not identities
- Keep high-stakes interpretation with qualified professionals
Questions
Common questions
Is 100 always the average IQ?
It is a common reporting convention, but interpretation still depends on the specific test, edition and norm group.
What percentile is an IQ of 115?
On a normal model with mean 100 and standard deviation 15, 115 is approximately the 84.134th percentile. This means about 84.134% of that model lies at or below 115; it does not mean 84.134% of questions were answered correctly. Use the administered test's own percentile if available.
Is an IQ of 100 the same as getting 100% correct?
No. On the common 100/15 scale, 100 is the mean standardized score. Getting 100% correct describes a raw result on a particular set of questions and cannot be converted into IQ without suitable norms.
Can two different tests give different IQ scores?
Yes. They may sample different domains, use different norms, contain measurement error and be administered under different conditions.
Is percentile the same as percent correct?
No. Percent correct is a raw test proportion. Percentile is a norm-referenced rank based on a comparison distribution.
Sources and standards used for this guide
These references support the general testing principles discussed here. They do not validate Ikigain's independently written item set or create population norms for it.
- NIST — normal distribution and cumulative distribution function
- OpenStax Psychology 2e — measures of intelligence and score scales
- Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing — open-access standards
- American Psychological Association — testing, assessment and measurement
- Deary (2012), Intelligence, Annual Review of Psychology